|
Facing ARMageddon Borrowers Grapple With Refinancing, WSJ |
|
Housing analysts expect
mortgage rates to rise this spring as the Federal Reserve stops buying
up mortgage-backed securities. That means many borrowers who use
adjustable-rate mortgages have a big decision to make: refinance now
into historically low fixed rates or stick with an ARM that’s currently
even lower? We took a look in this story last year at some of these borrowers
who were grappling with this decision when rates first fell. “I’d
rather take my beating now than wait and find out the beating is a
massacre,” said Jim Sullivan, a Connecticut homeowner who’d wanted to
refinance and pay a slightly higher rate but who’s wife prevailed in
keeping them in their ARM.
Amy Hoak at WSJ MarketWatch offers
the following advice to borrowers who choose not to refinance - "They
need to pay special attention to the index to which their ARM is tied —
the 1-year Treasury or the Libor, for example. If someone decided to
do watchful waiting, they should establish a rule for themselves.
Something like ‘if that index increases by more than 1 or 1.5%, I’m
going to move, I’m going to refinance,’” said Jack Guttentag, professor
of finance emeritus at the Wharton School of the University of
Pennsylvania. “If you’re not prepared to exercise this surveillance,
you should refinance right now and trade short-term loss for long-term
stability.” Others recommend that borrowers who opt not to refinance
into a fixed rate should sock away all the savings that accrues from
sticking with the adjustable rate. Then, if rates shoot up, they can
refinance into a fixed-rate loan while paying down their loan balance
with the savings they’ve accumulated, says Keith Gumbinger of HSH
Associates, a financial publisher.
Feb. 24, 2010 WSJ
Go to this April 16, 2009 WSJ Story
|